a Know the Known: energy
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Ukraine Crisis: Time for Europe to give (clean) coal a bigger share

Did anyone of us ever think that switching from coal to imported gas could pose a major risk to the security of energy supplies in Europe?

At least six European countries rely exclusively on one country for natural gas supply – Russia. During a recent press conference Donald Tusk, the Polish prime minister called for changes in the EU energy policy and added that “Germany’s dependence on Russian gas may effectively decrease Europe’s sovereignty”.
EU relies on Russia for 30% of its natural gas imports, with 80% of that delivered through Ukrainian pipelines. Ukraine is a major gas transit nation for supplies from Russia to EU. Earlier this month Russia warned it could stop distributing gas to Ukraine over unpaid bills and any such move can have dramatic consequences for the EU.  With Europe’s main natural gas supply route at risk this provides the policy makers in the EU re-think and direct more attention to Europe’s indigenous coal resources as well as secured and reliable coal imports.
Source: BBC News
Coal accounts for 90% of the EU’s fossil fuel energy and natural gas accounts for only 7%. Hence, it is not surprising at all that Europe imports almost 70% of its natural gas and as per a report from European Commission it will have to import close to 80% by 2030.

Coal continues to remain integral to EU, as it creates jobs, keeps the domestic producers in business and more importantly reinforces the continent’s energy security. Imported coal has been a reliable source of energy for Europe. Unlike natural gas coal imports are not dependent upon transport infrastructure such as LNG terminals or pipelines so any drop in supply from one country can be easily filled by another supplier. Currently, 60% of EU’s coal imports come from the USA, South Africa, Australia & Colombia & 25% is sourced from Russia.

There is a strong security argument against over-reliance on natural gas imports from Russia and this should be given more attention in the EU’s 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. None of the targets, measures & policies proposed as part of this package should force Europe into a position where it is slowly abandoning the most abundant, affordable and secure energy fuel it is endowed with to the benefit of imported natural gas.


Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Denying developing countries access to coal is like restricting food aid to the poor

Coal mining plays a significant role in many national economies. Developing countries rank highly among the world's major coal producing countries. In cases of China, India and South Africa coal is utilized for domestic electricity generation. Moreover, these countries have export markets generating export revenue. Colombia and Indonesia earn considerable export revenues from the coal production industry which is highly export-oriented. Coal currently provides 30% of the global energy needs, 41% of its electricity and 68% of its steel.
Coal in Electricity Generation
Pakistan is the sixth most populous country in the world with an estimated population of 184.35 million in 2012 - 2013. With a growth rate of 2.0 percent in 2012/2013, it is estimated that Pakistan will move to the fifth position by 2050. With rapid urbanization and population boom in major cities of Pakistan, the demand for electricity continues to exceed the supply. As per the Power and Water Ministry the supply of electricity stands at only 12,150 MW while demand is 16,400 MW creating a shortfall of 4,250 MW. Opportunity lies in the crisis, they say.

Increased investment in the technological development and higher labor productivity through improvement in education, health and training facilities are the main modes of increasing productivity of human resources. But how is this all possible without an investment in the energy sector, primarily coal.

Apart from being the sixth most populous state, the country is the sixth richest nation in respect of coal reserves, amounting to more than 200 billion tons. For further clarity, these coal reserves account for 2% of the reserves in the Asia-Pacific region and 0.2% of the world. Of this 200 billion tons, 185.5 billion tons (93%) of the coal reserves are in Thar in the province of Sindh which is 8 hours drive from the coastal city of Karachi. All coal is sub-bituminous and lignite in grade and is optimum for the energy sector. With the Chinese assistance Pakistan has 3 X 50 MW power plants in Lakhra, Balochistan and only 15 MW is being produced which is only 0.1% of the actual energy mix as displayed above. Majority of the electrification is via Oil which has traded above the $ 100 mark for quite some time in the international market and Pakistan nearly imports all its oil requirements. The other primary source is Gas. Gas is currently being increasingly consumed by the industries, households and the transportation sector in Pakistan. This has caused bottlenecks in timely supply of gas resulting in shortages and power cuts. The other source is hydroelectric where Pakistan faces an issue of water shortages in rivers and banks which have sources in Indian controlled Kashmir. There have been several rounds of dialogues between the two neighbors India and Pakistan to abide by the Indus Water Treaty and Pakistan has voiced its concern on international conventions and forums regarding India building dams in Kashmir. 

The current energy mix is quite expensive which is causing unrest in public and pushing businesses out of the country. The Pakistani economy can save around $26 billion in fuel costs over the next 15 years if thermal plants of only 420MW are shifted to coal.
Many of the countries with significant coal reserves also have significant coal production. However, Pakistan is counted amongst those nations whose coal reserves are yet to be utilized at a large scale. This provides economic opportunity to further develop the coal extraction industry and poses a great potential for a secure and affordable domestic energy supply using the indigenous coal reserves.

Pakistan currently imports more than 6 million tons of coal annually to meet the requirement of its thriving cement and ailing steel industry resulting in loss of foreign reserves and lost employment opportunities at home.

The current prime minister of Pakistan, Mr. Nawaz Sharif and his government, have several times shown interest in setting up greenfield power projects in Gadani and converting diesel and furnace oil based thermal power plants to coal. There has been no constructive talks on how could Pakistan mobilize its internal resource to attract capital inflow.

Earlier governments had policies directing towards exploiting the local Thar coal reserves to produce energy, but due to Asian Development Bank’s withdrawal of USD 1.4 billion in finance, Pakistan will resort to coal imports, atleast in the short run, to provide cheap electricity to the consumers and breathe life into industries, textile in particular. It appears that multilateral banks listen only to their donors, not their customers. And donor governments, like the US and the EU, are more interested in being politically correct on climate control than actually addressing poverty. It is interesting to note that US is the largest producer of coal, accounting for 13.4% of the global coal production and consumes 88% of the coal produced domestically and half of the electricity produced in the country is generated through coal.

For critics: Coal has a bad reputation due to the widely held view that it causes global warming and is responsible for death of many miners. What people don't tend to realize that coal has changed the living conditions of many in the developing countries such as India and China. For example, China, a model country for the developing world, has witnessed 536% growth in GDP since 1990 and more than 660 million people have been lifted out of poverty. Today more than 99% of the Chinese population has access to electricity. Coal has proven to be a "critical enabler" for successful economies. This has helped countries to further invest in cleaner technology and renewable energy resources. Coal is potentially the "fuel" towards any successful economy.


Monday, April 9, 2012

The Failed Corporations; A Lesson to Learn



1- South Sea Bubble (1711-1720)

Investors had no idea of how their investments were being utilized in the business by the directors. The troubles arose when Spain entered in war with Britain. Directors, knowing the situation, started selling off their investments secretly. This led to a depressing effect on the investors' confidence . As a result issuing shares in the UK was banned (until 1825) and investors started shifting their investments to the U.S. Some historians name this collapse as mother of all failures.




2 - Polly Peck International, PPI (1940-1990)

Asil Nadir, a Turkish Cypriot, took over a major share in PPI as a Chief Executive. The company was mainly in to the electronics trading, but later entered into the trading of foodstuff competing with giants like Chiquita and Dole. A millions of pounds of funds were transferred to subsidiaries in Northern Cyprus in form of payments. These companies were being run by Asil Nadir's son. The company started to default on its payments to creditors which alarmed the board and authorities.Ultimately, the company collapsed.




3 - Maxwell Foundation (1970-1992)

Robert Maxwell misappropriated the funds, including the Mirror Group pension fund, to finance his loss making ventures. Neither the auditors nor the board were able to prevent this misappropriation which led to miserable failures.




4- Barings Bank (1762 - 1995)

Nick Leeson headed the trading of derivatives' operations in Singapore. This business was being run/managed during a 'deregulation period'. There were no controls, segregation of duties and no division between front and back office. The traders were accounting for the transactions either incorrectly or fraudulently and reporting inflated profits to the head office. Nick Leeson was gambling the bank's money (or the public monies). The money kept arriving and Nick Leeson kept gambling. It was the Kobe earthquake which caused a stock market crash (which affected all the tiger economies) resulting in a loss of £800 million to Barings Bank. Ultimately, Barings bank was sold to ING for £1.




5- Enron (1985-2001)

An Energy company headed from Houston, Texas was run by Kenneth Lay, the chairman, who entered in to contracts to deal in energy derivatives. The company had set special purpose entities for off balance sheet financing, in order to channel funds into Enron without the need of reflecting the substance in the accounts, i.e. hide its debt. The company was downgraded by various credit rating agencies impacting the investors' confidence. The share prices were on a free fall and the company faced some serious issues with the cash flow. The results were the same: Wind it!